1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8893 OF 2016 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 17602 OF 2015 ] DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Appellant(s) VERSUS PARMAL AND ORS. Respondent(s) WITH Page 1 2 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 33629 OF 2015 ] CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8907 OF 2016 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 35233 OF 2015 ] Page 2 3 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 10616 OF 2016 ] CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8934 OF 2016 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 23656 OF 2016 ] J U D G M E N T KURIAN, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgment in Civil Appeal No. 8477 of 2016 Page 3 4 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 8467 of 2015.
3. These appeals are, accordingly, dismissed.
4. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of these cases, the appellant is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh.
5. We make it clear that in case no fresh acquisition proceedings are initiated within the said period of one year from today by issuing a Notification under Section 11 of the Act, the appellant, if in possession, shall return the physical possession of the land to the original land owner.
Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. No costs.
. J.
[ KURIAN JOSEPH ] . J.
[ ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN ] New Delhi; September 08, 2016.
Page 4