Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Supreme Court Of India
  4. /
  5. 2008
  6. /
  7. January

Commnr. Of Income Tax, Kolhapur vs Icici Bank Ltd

Supreme Court Of India|13 October, 2008

JUDGMENT / ORDER

other hand supported the judgment of the Tribunal as upheld by the High Court.
3. A similar question came up for consideration before this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Corporation Bank (2008 (166) Taxman 388). This court held as follows:
"Leave granted in special leave petitions.
The short point which arises in this batch of civil appeals is whether interest earned by the assessees-banks on dated Government securities was liable to be assessed under section 2(7) read with Section 4 of the Interest Tax Act, 1974. In our view, there is a basic difference between loans and advances on the one hand and investments/securities on the other. This difference is indicated in the provisions of the Income tax Act, the Companies Act as well as the Bank Regulation Act. These aspects have been discussed in detail in two decisions of the Bombay High Court, namely Discount and Finance House of India Ltd. v. S.K. Bhardwaj, CIT reported in MANU/MH/0628/2002, as also in another decision of the Bombay High Court reported in MANU/MH/0629/2002 in the case of CIT v. United Western Bank Ltd. It is not in dispute that the revenue has accepted the aforesaid two judgments of the Bombay High Court. We are in agreement with the view expressed by the Bombay High Court.
For the aforestated reasons there is no merit in the civil appeals filed by the department. The same are dismissed No order as to costs."
4. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that this Court's decision related to the interest on government securities. Learned counsel for the assessee submitted that in the instant case the interest earned was on government securities only. The stand is denied by learned counsel for the appellant. Let the Tribunal examine the factual position as to whether the interest involved in the present case is on government securities. If that be so, the ratio of the decision in Corporation Bank's case (supra) will apply to the facts of the present case and if the interest earned is not solely on government securities, the ratio of the decision will not apply.
5. The appeals are disposed of accordingly.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Commnr. Of Income Tax, Kolhapur vs Icici Bank Ltd

Court

Supreme Court Of India

JudgmentDate
13 October, 2008
Judges
  • Arijit Pasayat
  • Mukundakam Sharma