Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Supreme Court Of India
  4. /
  5. 2000
  6. /
  7. January

Ashok Umraomal Sancheti vs Rispalchand

Supreme Court Of India|03 January, 2000

JUDGMENT / ORDER

ORDER B.N. Kirpal, J.
1. Special leave granted.
2. The dispute arises out of suits, which had been filed by the appellants under Order 37 C.P.C. On applications for leave to defend being filed, the High Court granted unconditional leave.
3. It would have been of assistance if the High Court had given reasons as to why unconditional leave was being granted. From the impugned orders, we are un able to fathom the reason for granting unconditional leave to defend.
4. We, accordingly, allow these appeals, set aside the impugned orders of the High Court and remit the cases to the High Court for deciding afresh the applications of the respondent herein for leave to defend. In the meantime pending such decision there will be an attachment of the entire property of the respondent herein.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ashok Umraomal Sancheti vs Rispalchand

Court

Supreme Court Of India

JudgmentDate
03 January, 2000
Judges
  • B Kirpal
  • S R Babu